Categories
Shop by Price
Vendors
Join our Newsletter
Subtotal: $0.00

Blog

Cranky Outputs of Undervalued Technicians, by Phil Fournier

Last month Adam Robertson posted an article entitled "The Cranky Outputs of P0172 on a 2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser" in which he described the process he followed to diagnos a problem that left behind very few obvious clues.

In response to that article, Phil Fournier asks, why a "high tech diag is so undervalued" and how to overcome that.

Adam,
I love the logical diagnostic process you followed to identify the crank sensor (with no corresponding P0336 or any other typical code) as being the source of the problem.  Here is my issue, not with your diagnosis at all, but with the low value placed on the ability to do just this sort of difficult diagnosis; few people are willing to pay for it.

Example #1: 2011 Nissan Cube, won’t start.
Car was in three different shops, including Nissan.  Nissan got rid of the problem by quoting $13k for the repair.  I have no idea what they intended to do for the price but it seemed obvious that they didn’t want the job.  The third shop that looked at the vehicle requested my assistance.  I told him that since it was a difficult problem, I would charge 4 hours labor ($380 at my $95 an hour rate) for the diagnosis.  Then the vehicle owner came and spoke with me but did not bring the vehicle in.  To my knowledge, the vehicle continues to be inoperable.

Example #2: 2002 Ford Ranger 4.0 liter, won’t start, new engine. 
Sent to me on the tow truck from a trans shop who had apparently installed the engine.  We started with a one hour diagnosis, going over the basics of compression, spark, and fuel, and determine the vehicle was shutting down spark as soon as the engine lit off under cranking conditions.  Having exhausted more than the allotted one hour doing the baseline testing, I asked for 4 hours, knowing several things: 
- First, this was going to be hard core, PICO diagnosis. 
- Two, no credit would result to me or my shop because this was a sublet and the other shop would not want the customer to know they had been unable to fix it. 
- Three, since the vehicle was from another shop already, I would not even be able to hope for future business other than yet another difficult diagnosis.  
A few days later the vehicle was towed out.

Example #3: 2005 Ford F150 5.4l, lack of power at high rpm. 
410,000 miles on the vehicle, engine has been replaced.  Sublet from another shop.  Vehicle feels lean under hard acceleration.  VE testing shows fairly good VE of 81% but O2 sensors continue to switch at WOT rather than going full rich.  Downstream sensors reflect mixture is slightly lean.  Fuel pump has been replaced, fuel pressure does not drop at WOT.  Fuel trim before WOT is slightly high at about +15LTFT and +10 STFT.   There are no misfires in Mode 6 and there is no feel of a misfire.  Exhaust had been previously dropped to rule out cat converter blockage by the other shop.  Once again, I asked for extra time beyond the one hour due to the complexity of the diagnosis.  Once again the extra charge was declined and the vehicle left my shop undiagnosed.

The bottom line:  Your diagnosis on your PT Cruiser should have been worth hundreds of dollars. 

When I do the difficult jobs, I expect to be paid for them and paid well.  Yet, few people or other repair shops are willing to step up to the plate and pay the value.  It is highly frustrating to me that it doesn’t work that way.  I expect I would have been able to solve each of the three aforementioned vehicles.  But, to do so, I would have had to content myself with “job satisfaction” and not monetary  value.  Perhaps I would have ended up with a valuable case history for a training class.  Still, it isn’t right that the high tech diag is so undervalued.  It makes me despair for the future of this industry.  Someone might have stumbled on the fix for your PT by randomly replacing parts.  Had they guessed the CKP sensor, they would have been considered a hero, just as much as you who actually found the problem. 

Do you have any suggestions as to how to overcome this reluctance to pay for value?

Phil.

 

Share your thoughts: Log in to post a comment.
If you are logged into the site, you should see the comment form below.

4 Comments
  1. Dominick D
    02/07/2016 at 10:21:04 AM
    Awesome article, nice graphics. Thanks
  2. Greg Kohler
    02/07/2016 at 06:23:40 PM
    I would love to see a response to Phil's question! Also, how did you (Adam) charge for the PTC diag?
  3. Adam Robertson
    02/11/2016 at 06:50:00 PM
    I really think that Phil hit a home run on this point. There are really several sides to this and I could write a novel on this issue. I am only going to address ONE small but frustrating point in this comment.

    Educating our customers (shops, consumers...etc.) has and will always be a difficult task. Years of providing our customers with 'free diagnostics' or 'free check engine lamp inspections' and other ultra low priced 'lost leader' type advertising has damaged our worth as technicians. This is our own fault as an industry and as long as it continues, we will be facing an uphill battle to provide proper diagnostics with fair compensation for the equipment, education and time necessary to do things right.

    As an automotive instructor/diagnostic specialist I hear/see this all too often. Think about it...when was the last time you heard a plumber say 'free turd chasing'?

    Phil, if you are up to it I believe that we should dig deeper into these topics and write another blog(s). Unless we are getting too political:)
    Thanks
  4. Adam Robertson
    02/11/2016 at 07:02:41 PM
    In response to Greg, I don't believe that this is the venue to talk about labor rates but I can give you my opinion.

    Diagnostics includes not only the time spent actually working on the vehicle but also, equipment/subscription costs, continuing education/training dedication along with practical knowledge painfully learned over the years. Regardless of the 'actual' time spent....In my opinion this would be worth 3-4 hundred dollars in diagnostic charge followed up with only the part(s) required to repair the problem. This would still be less overall money spent than the 'shotgun approach'.
    Thanks